WEKO3
アイテム
カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/41798
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/41798df6dc6bb-23dc-4da4-bcc4-a84877d2182a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
62_1-13.pdf (363.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-04-25 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考 | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 理性の事実 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 意志規定 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 定言命法 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Rethinking “the Fact of Reason” in Kant’s Ethics | |||||
| 著者 |
高畑, 菜子
× 高畑, 菜子 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 55732 | |||||
| 姓名 | Takahata, Nako | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | To date, numerous critical accounts of Kant’s “the fact of reason” have been presented, reproaching Kant for dogmatism. This paper reconsiders the fact of reason, and assesses this reproach. Herein, an attempt to explain his intended meaning is made. In the Remark to Section 7 of the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant executes the terminological baptism. He posits that the “consciousness of this fundamental law is a fact of reason.” As a synthetic a priori proposition, this fundamental law is a categorical imperative. Thus, the fact of reason is consciousness of the categorical imperative. Willaschek suggests the fact of reason is a deed of reason. What, then, does reason do? This paper posits that reason determines will. One cannot be conscious of the categorical imperative without a determining of the will. Since Kant suggests the fact of reason is justified by common human understanding, it may be identified as the feeling of respect. The categorical imperative is distinguished from the feeling of respect, however, and so it must be emphasized that the fact of reason is not the feeling of respect, because the former precedes the latter. The fact of reason is the standpoint of Kant’s moral philosophy—our common moral cognition and its judgment on the basis of the fact of reason. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
現代社会文化研究 en : 現代社会文化研究 巻 62, p. 1-13, 発行日 2016-03 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13458485 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN1046766X | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
