ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5bcb26f1-3fcc-4ee9-895d-4536fde4ac45"}, "_deposit": {"id": "7358", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "7358"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00007358", "sets": ["456", "775"]}, "item_7_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Rethinking “the Fact of Reason” in Kant’s Ethics"}]}, "item_7_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2016-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "13", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "62", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "現代社会文化研究"}, {"bibliographic_title": "現代社会文化研究", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_7_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "To date, numerous critical accounts of Kant’s “the fact of reason” have been presented, reproaching Kant for dogmatism. This paper reconsiders the fact of reason, and assesses this reproach. Herein, an attempt to explain his intended meaning is made. In the Remark to Section 7 of the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant executes the terminological baptism. He posits that the “consciousness of this fundamental law is a fact of reason.” As a synthetic a priori proposition, this fundamental law is a categorical imperative. Thus, the fact of reason is consciousness of the categorical imperative. Willaschek suggests the fact of reason is a deed of reason. What, then, does reason do? This paper posits that reason determines will. One cannot be conscious of the categorical imperative without a determining of the will. Since Kant suggests the fact of reason is justified by common human understanding, it may be identified as the feeling of respect. The categorical imperative is distinguished from the feeling of respect, however, and so it must be emphasized that the fact of reason is not the feeling of respect, because the former precedes the latter. The fact of reason is the standpoint of Kant’s moral philosophy—our common moral cognition and its judgment on the basis of the fact of reason.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_7_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "55732", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Takahata, Nako"}]}]}, "item_7_publisher_7": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科"}]}, "item_7_select_19": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_7_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN1046766X", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_7_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13458485", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "高畑, 菜子"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "55731", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-08-06"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "62_1-13.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "363.8 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 363800.0, "url": {"label": "62_1-13.pdf", "url": "https://niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/7358/files/62_1-13.pdf"}, "version_id": "0ac278f3-3969-4e49-872d-5c91fea09e30"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "理性の事実", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "意志規定", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "定言命法", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考"}, {"subitem_title": "カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "7", "owner": "1", "path": ["456", "775"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10191/41798", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2016-04-25"}, "publish_date": "2016-04-25", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "7358", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. 210 大学院現代社会文化研究科
  2. 20 紀要
  3. 01 現代社会文化研究
  4. 第62号
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 03 紀要論文

カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考

http://hdl.handle.net/10191/41798
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/41798
df6dc6bb-23dc-4da4-bcc4-a84877d2182a
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
62_1-13.pdf 62_1-13.pdf (363.8 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2016-04-25
タイトル
タイトル カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考
タイトル
言語 en
タイトル カント倫理学における「理性の事実」再考
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 理性の事実
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 意志規定
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 定言命法
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Rethinking “the Fact of Reason” in Kant’s Ethics
著者 高畑, 菜子

× 高畑, 菜子

WEKO 55731

高畑, 菜子

Search repository
著者別名
識別子 55732
識別子Scheme WEKO
姓名 Takahata, Nako
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 To date, numerous critical accounts of Kant’s “the fact of reason” have been presented, reproaching Kant for dogmatism. This paper reconsiders the fact of reason, and assesses this reproach. Herein, an attempt to explain his intended meaning is made. In the Remark to Section 7 of the Critique of Practical Reason, Kant executes the terminological baptism. He posits that the “consciousness of this fundamental law is a fact of reason.” As a synthetic a priori proposition, this fundamental law is a categorical imperative. Thus, the fact of reason is consciousness of the categorical imperative. Willaschek suggests the fact of reason is a deed of reason. What, then, does reason do? This paper posits that reason determines will. One cannot be conscious of the categorical imperative without a determining of the will. Since Kant suggests the fact of reason is justified by common human understanding, it may be identified as the feeling of respect. The categorical imperative is distinguished from the feeling of respect, however, and so it must be emphasized that the fact of reason is not the feeling of respect, because the former precedes the latter. The fact of reason is the standpoint of Kant’s moral philosophy—our common moral cognition and its judgment on the basis of the fact of reason.
書誌情報 現代社会文化研究
en : 現代社会文化研究

巻 62, p. 1-13, 発行日 2016-03
出版者
出版者 新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 13458485
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN1046766X
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 19:16:01.111296
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3