WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "0612fb98-eaed-41b7-96cc-4a24ed2ea35c"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 4, "id": "2001248", "owners": [4], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2001248"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001248", "sets": ["1710740589765"]}, "author_link": [], "item_1627361970403": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_7_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2024-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "4", "bibliographicPageEnd": "91", "bibliographicPageStart": "71", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "56", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "法政理論", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_7_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The case method is a cornerstone of Anglo-American legal education, shaping the way aspiring lawyers develop their legal reasoning and analytical skills. Pioneered in the late 19th century by Christopher Columbus Langdell at Harvard Law School, the case method involves immersing students in real-world legal cases, guiding them through the process of identifying and extracting legal principles from judicial decisions. This approach contrasts with traditional lectures, where students passively receive information. Instead, the case method actively engages students, encouraging them to critically analyze precedent, discern patterns, and apply legal principles to new scenarios. This hands-on approach fosters a deep understanding of legal concepts and cultivates the ability to think like a lawyer. In essence, the ability to think like a lawyer means the ability to solve legal problems in a logical, analytical fashion. Legal problem solving is a crucial skill for lawyers and legal professionals. It involves analyzing complex legal issues, identifying relevant laws and precedents, and developing strategies for resolving legal disputes. The ability to solve legal problems effectively is essential for success in the legal profession. This paper examines two tools for legal problem solving: the IRAC method and ChatGPT. The IRAC method is a widely used approach to legal problem solving. It involves four steps: identifying the Issue, stating the relevant Rule of law, applying the Rule to the facts of the case, and drawing a Conclusion. The IRAC method is a systematic and logical way of analyzing legal problems. It can help lawyers and legal professionals to organize their thoughts and develop persuasive arguments. However, some critics argue that the IRAC method is overly rigid and formulaic, and that it can lead to a superficial analysis of legal issues. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence tool that uses natural language processing to generate text based on user input. It can be used to assist lawyers and legal professionals in legal problem solving by generating responses to legal questions and providing relevant information about the law. ChatGPT has the potential to save time and increase efficiency in legal research, but it is not without its limitations. Some critics have raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of AI-based legal tools. The integration of IRAC and ChatGPT in legal problem solving can have several benefits. For example, using ChatGPT to generate relevant legal rules and precedents can save time and reduce the risk of overlooking important information. The IRAC method can provide a framework for organizing the information generated by ChatGPT and developing persuasive legal arguments. However, the integration of IRAC and ChatGPT also presents challenges, such as the need for training and expertise in both legal problem solving and AI technologies. Legal education has traditionally relied on a case-based method that emphasizes analysis and argumentation. However, the integration of IRAC and ChatGPT can provide a new approach to legal education that emphasizes problem solving and technology. Pedagogical strategies for teaching legal problem solving using IRAC and ChatGPT can include interactive exercises, case studies, and simulations. Evaluation of the effectiveness of using IRAC and ChatGPT in legal problem solving education can involve assessments of student learning outcomes and feedback from students and instructors. The IRAC method and ChatGPT are two tools that can assist lawyers and legal professionals in legal problem solving. The integration of these tools presents opportunities and challenges for legal problem solving and legal education. Further research and development of these tools can lead to new approaches to legal problem solving.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_7_publisher_7": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "新潟大学法学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_7_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00226270", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_7_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0286-1577", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Ciano, Leonardo", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2024-03-18"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "56(4)_71-91.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.27MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": "1.27MB", "url": {"objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001248/files/56(4)_71-91.pdf"}, "version_id": "b03034e3-ecfd-4117-ba99-a25791794353"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "From Parchment to Pixels : Reimagining Legal Education in the Age of AI (SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO PROF. SAWADA)", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "From Parchment to Pixels : Reimagining Legal Education in the Age of AI (SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO PROF. SAWADA)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "7", "owner": "4", "path": ["456", "1710740589765"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002001248", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2024-03-18"}, "publish_date": "2024-03-18", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2001248", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["From Parchment to Pixels : Reimagining Legal Education in the Age of AI (SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO PROF. SAWADA)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
From Parchment to Pixels : Reimagining Legal Education in the Age of AI (SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO PROF. SAWADA)
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002001248
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002001248e1a8df2e-8666-4212-980a-f660aaf5036c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
56(4)_71-91.pdf (1.27MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2024-03-18 | |||||||
タイトル | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
タイトル | From Parchment to Pixels : Reimagining Legal Education in the Age of AI (SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO PROF. SAWADA) | |||||||
言語 | ||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||
著者 |
Ciano, Leonardo
× Ciano, Leonardo
|
|||||||
抄録 | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
内容記述 | The case method is a cornerstone of Anglo-American legal education, shaping the way aspiring lawyers develop their legal reasoning and analytical skills. Pioneered in the late 19th century by Christopher Columbus Langdell at Harvard Law School, the case method involves immersing students in real-world legal cases, guiding them through the process of identifying and extracting legal principles from judicial decisions. This approach contrasts with traditional lectures, where students passively receive information. Instead, the case method actively engages students, encouraging them to critically analyze precedent, discern patterns, and apply legal principles to new scenarios. This hands-on approach fosters a deep understanding of legal concepts and cultivates the ability to think like a lawyer. In essence, the ability to think like a lawyer means the ability to solve legal problems in a logical, analytical fashion. Legal problem solving is a crucial skill for lawyers and legal professionals. It involves analyzing complex legal issues, identifying relevant laws and precedents, and developing strategies for resolving legal disputes. The ability to solve legal problems effectively is essential for success in the legal profession. This paper examines two tools for legal problem solving: the IRAC method and ChatGPT. The IRAC method is a widely used approach to legal problem solving. It involves four steps: identifying the Issue, stating the relevant Rule of law, applying the Rule to the facts of the case, and drawing a Conclusion. The IRAC method is a systematic and logical way of analyzing legal problems. It can help lawyers and legal professionals to organize their thoughts and develop persuasive arguments. However, some critics argue that the IRAC method is overly rigid and formulaic, and that it can lead to a superficial analysis of legal issues. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence tool that uses natural language processing to generate text based on user input. It can be used to assist lawyers and legal professionals in legal problem solving by generating responses to legal questions and providing relevant information about the law. ChatGPT has the potential to save time and increase efficiency in legal research, but it is not without its limitations. Some critics have raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of AI-based legal tools. The integration of IRAC and ChatGPT in legal problem solving can have several benefits. For example, using ChatGPT to generate relevant legal rules and precedents can save time and reduce the risk of overlooking important information. The IRAC method can provide a framework for organizing the information generated by ChatGPT and developing persuasive legal arguments. However, the integration of IRAC and ChatGPT also presents challenges, such as the need for training and expertise in both legal problem solving and AI technologies. Legal education has traditionally relied on a case-based method that emphasizes analysis and argumentation. However, the integration of IRAC and ChatGPT can provide a new approach to legal education that emphasizes problem solving and technology. Pedagogical strategies for teaching legal problem solving using IRAC and ChatGPT can include interactive exercises, case studies, and simulations. Evaluation of the effectiveness of using IRAC and ChatGPT in legal problem solving education can involve assessments of student learning outcomes and feedback from students and instructors. The IRAC method and ChatGPT are two tools that can assist lawyers and legal professionals in legal problem solving. The integration of these tools presents opportunities and challenges for legal problem solving and legal education. Further research and development of these tools can lead to new approaches to legal problem solving. | |||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 法政理論 巻 56, 号 4, p. 71-91, 発行日 2024-03 |
|||||||
出版者 | ||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||
出版者 | 新潟大学法学会 | |||||||
ISSN | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||
収録物識別子 | 0286-1577 | |||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
収録物識別子 | AN00226270 | |||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |