WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "49dadc6e-e8d1-4aa8-b90c-776ffd45701a"}, "_deposit": {"id": "2000784", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2000784"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000784", "sets": ["1677557190115"]}, "author_link": [], "item_1627361970403": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_7_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2022-11", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "36", "bibliographicPageStart": "19", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "75", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "現代社会文化研究", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "THE JOURNAL OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY AND CULTURE", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_7_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This article classifies the reflexive constructions of Japanese and Chinese into typical, intermediate, and peripheral constructions, and discusses the characteristics and differences between the two languages regarding beneficiency at the syntactic level. There are several differences in typical reflexive constructions. First, in Chinese, the numeral plus quantifier phrase must be added when the sentence contains a body contact verb. Second, the target of the reflexive pronoun shows a different behavior, particularly in the case of passive sentences and ba-construction in Chinese. Third, the anaphoric target of the reflexive pronoun and the third person pronoun may differ, especially whether the reflexive pronoun can refer to the dead. Fourth, the beneficiency in typical reflexive constructions derives from the viewpoint constraints of the reflexive pronoun. Regarding intermediate and peripheral reflexive constructions, Japanese and Chinese differ in the possibility of passivization. Furthermore, Chinese exploits the preposition gei to express beneficiency in an intermediate or a peripheral reflexive construction. The predicate verb in an intermediate or a peripheral reflexive is reflexive in nature. However, with the insertion of the preposition gei, reflexivity is bleached and the sentence acquires beneficiency. Conversely, Japanese uses the same construction for both cases.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_7_publisher_7": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "Graduate School of Modern Society and Culture, NIIGATA University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_7_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN1046766X", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_7_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1345-8485", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "趙, 蓉俊子", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "Zhao, Rongjunzi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2023-02-28"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "75_19-36.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "686KB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": "686KB", "url": {"objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000784/files/75_19-36.pdf"}, "version_id": "8055011a-5e1d-4025-a67d-3eb77986261e"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "典型的再帰構文", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "非再帰的再帰構文", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "恩恵性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "意志性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "再帰性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "日中語の再帰構文の対照研究 : 恩恵性を中心に", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "日中語の再帰構文の対照研究 : 恩恵性を中心に", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "A Contrastive Study of Reflexive Constructions in Japanese and Chinese : Focusing on Beneficiency", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "7", "owner": "1", "path": ["456", "1677557190115"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002000784", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2023-02-28"}, "publish_date": "2023-02-28", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2000784", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["日中語の再帰構文の対照研究 : 恩恵性を中心に"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
日中語の再帰構文の対照研究 : 恩恵性を中心に
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002000784
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002000784f6f09cb6-5b98-40b7-95f9-4a9cfc08ef09
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
75_19-36.pdf (686KB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2023-02-28 | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
タイトル | 日中語の再帰構文の対照研究 : 恩恵性を中心に | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
タイトル | A Contrastive Study of Reflexive Constructions in Japanese and Chinese : Focusing on Beneficiency | |||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | 典型的再帰構文 | |||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | 非再帰的再帰構文 | |||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | 恩恵性 | |||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | 意志性 | |||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | 再帰性 | |||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
著者 |
趙, 蓉俊子
× 趙, 蓉俊子
|
|||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
内容記述 | This article classifies the reflexive constructions of Japanese and Chinese into typical, intermediate, and peripheral constructions, and discusses the characteristics and differences between the two languages regarding beneficiency at the syntactic level. There are several differences in typical reflexive constructions. First, in Chinese, the numeral plus quantifier phrase must be added when the sentence contains a body contact verb. Second, the target of the reflexive pronoun shows a different behavior, particularly in the case of passive sentences and ba-construction in Chinese. Third, the anaphoric target of the reflexive pronoun and the third person pronoun may differ, especially whether the reflexive pronoun can refer to the dead. Fourth, the beneficiency in typical reflexive constructions derives from the viewpoint constraints of the reflexive pronoun. Regarding intermediate and peripheral reflexive constructions, Japanese and Chinese differ in the possibility of passivization. Furthermore, Chinese exploits the preposition gei to express beneficiency in an intermediate or a peripheral reflexive construction. The predicate verb in an intermediate or a peripheral reflexive is reflexive in nature. However, with the insertion of the preposition gei, reflexivity is bleached and the sentence acquires beneficiency. Conversely, Japanese uses the same construction for both cases. | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 現代社会文化研究 en : THE JOURNAL OF THE STUDY OF MODERN SOCIETY AND CULTURE 巻 75, p. 19-36, 発行日 2022-11 |
|||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
出版者 | 新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科 | |||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
出版者 | Graduate School of Modern Society and Culture, NIIGATA University | |||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | 1345-8485 | |||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN1046766X | |||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |