ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To

Field does not validate

To

Field does not validate

To
lat lon distance


インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

  • RootNode

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 030 法学部
  2. 20 紀要
  3. 01 法政理論
  4. 第54巻第2号
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 03 紀要論文

Causation, Criminal Omissions and Medical Negligence : Some Doctrinal and Policy Aspects of a Common Law Approach

http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002000229
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/0002000229
2460797a-16da-4157-a758-c9b49b38609f
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
54(2)_1-39.pdf 54(2)_1-39.pdf (1.78MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2022-02-03
タイトル
タイトル Causation, Criminal Omissions and Medical Negligence : Some Doctrinal and Policy Aspects of a Common Law Approach
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 Mousourakis, George

× Mousourakis, George

en Mousourakis, George

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Although penal statutes differ considerably from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, it is nevertheless possible to discover on a doctrinal level significant similarities among diverse criminal justice systems, especially systems of countries belonging to the same legal family. England, New Zealand, and other common law jurisdictions have traditionally followed a bipartite structure of crime, distinguishing between objective (actus reus) and subjective (mens rea) aspects of offence definitions. While in paradigmatic cases criminal conduct will involve bodily movements, there are certain situations where liability may also arise from an omission or failure to act. Furthermore, a distinction is traditionally drawn between conduct crimes and result crimes. A conduct crime prohibits certain conduct regardless of its consequences; a result crime makes liability dependent on the consequences that flow from the accused's conduct. To establish liability for a result crime, it is required that the prosecution demonstrates a causal link between the accused's conduct (act or omission) and the prohibited result. This paper discusses doctrinal aspects of the law relating to causation and criminal omissions in New Zealand, with particular emphasis being placed on the issue of criminal responsibility for medical negligence. The analysis of substantive law includes consideration of the subjective and objective requirements for criminal liability as expressed in relevant legislative enactments and judicial decisions, as well as a number of practical and policy problems. The references to leading common law authorities, mainly from English law, add a useful dimension to the discussion of the issues. It is hoped that the present paper will be of value to scholars and legal professionals interested in the fields of criminal law theory, comparative criminal law, and medical criminal law.
言語 en
書誌情報 ja : 法政理論

巻 54, 号 2, p. 1-39, 発行日 2021-12
出版者
出版者 新潟大学法学会
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0286-1577
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00226270
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2022-02-03 04:02:43.901609
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

Mousourakis, George, 2021, Causation, Criminal Omissions and Medical Negligence : Some Doctrinal and Policy Aspects of a Common Law Approach: 新潟大学法学会, 1–39 p.

Loading...

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3