@article{oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00007815,
 author = {佐藤, 哲},
 journal = {現代社会文化研究, 現代社会文化研究},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The Inspection Panel of the World Bank was established as an appeals mechanism that receives claims from citizens who believe they have been directly harmed by the Bank's projects. Although the establishment of the Inspection Panel was an important step in moving toward more transparency of World Bank operations and the improvement in the Bank's accountability, and ultimately toward improved project quality at the Bank, there are still several problems in this Inspection Panel process that can be mentioned. This paper focuses on problems in the Inspection Panel process brought about by the Request for Inspection that alleged the Bank's non-compliance with its policies in West Poverty Reduction Project in China, and that in the Panel's investigation report for the Project. For the first time since Nepal ArunⅢ Proposed Hydroelectric Project case, the Panel was allowed to carry out its investigation,and as the result, the Bank's financing to the project was cancelled. Added to these , this paper refers to the contents of "1999 Conclusions of the Board's Second Review of the Inspection Panel", because it seems to us that review actually affects on the result of the process in this case.},
 pages = {177--189},
 title = {中国西部貧困削減プロジェクトにおける世界銀行査閲パネルの実行},
 volume = {29},
 year = {2004}
}