{"_buckets": {"deposit": "449e2332-057d-4b49-83f7-68dd497c9bc3"}, "_deposit": {"id": "7725", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "7725"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00007725", "sets": ["456", "802"]}, "item_7_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "A Study on Validity of the Short-term Acquisitive Prescription for Real Property: A Case which Include a Person Started Occupation of the Land in Bad Faith or Carelessly"}]}, "item_7_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2006-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "186", "bibliographicPageStart": "169", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "35", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "現代社会文化研究"}, {"bibliographic_title": "現代社会文化研究", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_7_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Section 162 (2) of the Japanese Civil Code provides that a person who has for ten years peaceably and openly held occupation of an immovable belonging to another with an intention to own it shall acquire the ownership of such immovable, if s/he started the occupation in good faith without fault (the short-term acquisitive prescription). The Supreme Court held that the validity of the rule of the short-term acquisitive prescription should be judged on whether or not the first occupant in the period had started the occupation in good faith without fault. According to the rule of this judicial precedent, it may happen that a succeeding the first occupant in good faith without fault shall obtain the ownership of that land at the expense of the original owner\u0027s interest on the ground of his/her occupation for less than ten years. It must be unfair for the original owner to be forced to lose his/her legitimate title in such a short period of time, and the owner should be given an opportunity to argue his/her title before completion of the short-term acquisitive prescription. This paper will examine the precedent and suggest that the occupant in bad faith or carelessness should be restricted to claim his/her interest for this kind of case.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_7_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "56391", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Sorimachi, Megumi"}]}]}, "item_7_publisher_7": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "新潟大学大学院現代社会文化研究科"}]}, "item_7_select_19": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_7_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN1046766X", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_7_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13458485", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "反町, めぐみ"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "56390", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-08-06"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "18_0229.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "142.1 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 142100.0, "url": {"label": "18_0229.pdf", "url": "https://niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/7725/files/18_0229.pdf"}, "version_id": "aca4efd8-a1c1-47dc-924a-9156340eb989"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "取得時効（162条)", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "占有継承（187条)", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "追奪担保責任（561条)", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "瑕疵ある占有を併合主張した場合における10年取得時効の成立の可否 : 最高裁昭和53年3月6日判決", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "瑕疵ある占有を併合主張した場合における10年取得時効の成立の可否 : 最高裁昭和53年3月6日判決"}, {"subitem_title": "瑕疵ある占有を併合主張した場合における10年取得時効の成立の可否 : 最高裁昭和53年3月6日判決", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "7", "owner": "1", "path": ["456", "802"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10191/1053", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2007-04-18"}, "publish_date": "2007-04-18", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "7725", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["瑕疵ある占有を併合主張した場合における10年取得時効の成立の可否 : 最高裁昭和53年3月6日判決"], "weko_shared_id": null}