@article{oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00020818,
 author = {高橋, 利明},
 issue = {8},
 journal = {新潟医学会雑誌, 新潟医学会雑誌},
 month = {Aug},
 note = {The author carried out the peridurography in 348 patients, on whom the peridural block treatment had no effect. The author also studied the supplementary role of the peridurography for diagnosing the spine diseases and treatment effects as well. The diagnostic value of the peridurography was compared with the myelography in 62 patients. The successful rate to be diagnosed to locate the illness was 92.9% with disc hernia, and 71.8 % with spinal canal stenosis. The former showed a significantly higher rate (p<0.05) with comparison to the latter. The author acknowledged a good to excellent pain-relieving effect of the peridurography as s treatment in 25.8% of disc hernia, and 23.7% with spinal canal stenosis. There were no significant differences in the effects of the peridurography between the two diseases. The rate of successful diagnosis was as follows：for disc hernia, 86.1% with myelography and 80.5% with peridurography；for spinal canal stenosis, 73.1% with myelography and 69.2% with peridurography. There were no significant difference in the success rate of diagnosis between the peridurography and myelography. Thus, the peridurography is thought to play quite a safe, useful, supplementary role as a screening test in the outpatients with spine diseases.},
 pages = {761--772},
 title = {腰椎疾患に対する硬膜外ブロック無効例における硬膜外造影の意義},
 volume = {106},
 year = {1992}
}