@article{oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000352,
 author = {趙, 蓉俊子 and Zhao, Rongjunzi},
 journal = {言語の普遍性と個別性, Universality and Individuality in Language},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This article provides a contrastive analysis of benefactive auxiliary verb constructions in Japanese and Chinese. The investigation shows the differences in the syntactic and semantic features between the Vte-kureru, Vte-ageru, and Vte-morau constructions in Japanese and the V-gei construction in Chinese. Although previous studies have focused on the perspectives of voice or other-benefactive sentences, the differences between Japanese and Chinese, especially in self-benefactive sentences that bring positive outcomes to the subject, have remain unexplored. This article examines the syntactic aspects of Japanese and Chinese benefactive auxiliary verb constructions, such as person restriction in subjects and the obligatoriness of indirect objects. It further explores semantic features such as the volitionality of the giver, intentionality of the giver, and predictability of the action. Additionally, it is argued that Japanese and Chinese greatly differ in the expressions of other-benefactive, malfactive, and self-benefactive constructions in the intentionality and causativity of the giver.},
 pages = {117--143},
 title = {日中語の授受補助動詞構文の対照 : 恩恵性を中心に},
 volume = {13},
 year = {2022}
}