WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "bdbc1d2c-c27b-4f2d-a060-e81475fed1d3"}, "_deposit": {"id": "2870", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2870"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002870", "sets": ["454", "502"]}, "item_5_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Expertise and Evaluative Development in Music"}]}, "item_5_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1996-06", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "144", "bibliographicPageStart": "136", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "44", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "教育心理学研究"}, {"bibliographic_title": "教育心理学研究", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_5_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "One hundred and forty-seven college students and 50 sixth-grade children, each being classified into three groups according to piano-playing skill, rated goodness of five sets of four performances (original (O), monotonous (M), swapped (S), and artificial (A)). M was constructed by electronically equalizing the intensity of the sounds, S by swapping the intensity among a half of the sounds, and A by assigning the intensity to each sound according to three rules. Immediately after the initial rating, the college students were exposed to the same sets of performances and were asked to rate again and to choose from eight adjectives the one describing best each performance. Analyses of ratings and of adjective selection revealed that even the non-learners could differentially and appropriately evaluate three performances (O, M, and S); as to A, the better skilled, the more negative was the subjects\u0027 evaluation. Coherence of ratings across the five sets for best performance was greater among the better skilled and the older subjects. Stability of goodness ranking between the two ratings by the college students was higher among the experienced than the non-learners.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_5_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "39484", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Oura, Yoko"}]}]}, "item_5_publisher_7": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "日本教育心理学会"}]}, "item_5_select_19": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_5_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00345837", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_5_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "00215015", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大浦, 容子"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "39483", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-07-30"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "44(2)_136-144.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "613.1 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 613100.0, "url": {"label": "44(2)_136-144.pdf", "url": "https://niigata-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2870/files/44(2)_136-144.pdf"}, "version_id": "3f458f20-fb8e-4566-a777-43edeae18a1c"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "productive expertise", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "receptive expertise", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "evaluative development", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "aesthetic evaluation", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討"}, {"subitem_title": "熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "5", "owner": "1", "path": ["454", "502"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10191/9773", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2009-10-22"}, "publish_date": "2009-10-22", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2870", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討"], "weko_shared_id": null}
熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/9773
http://hdl.handle.net/10191/977359a4a8e0-3594-4088-845a-44907ec067e3
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
44(2)_136-144.pdf (613.1 kB)
|
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2009-10-22 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | 熟達と評価的発達 : 音楽の領域での検討 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | productive expertise | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | receptive expertise | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | evaluative development | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | aesthetic evaluation | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | journal article | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Expertise and Evaluative Development in Music | |||||
著者 |
大浦, 容子
× 大浦, 容子 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 39484 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | Oura, Yoko | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | One hundred and forty-seven college students and 50 sixth-grade children, each being classified into three groups according to piano-playing skill, rated goodness of five sets of four performances (original (O), monotonous (M), swapped (S), and artificial (A)). M was constructed by electronically equalizing the intensity of the sounds, S by swapping the intensity among a half of the sounds, and A by assigning the intensity to each sound according to three rules. Immediately after the initial rating, the college students were exposed to the same sets of performances and were asked to rate again and to choose from eight adjectives the one describing best each performance. Analyses of ratings and of adjective selection revealed that even the non-learners could differentially and appropriately evaluate three performances (O, M, and S); as to A, the better skilled, the more negative was the subjects' evaluation. Coherence of ratings across the five sets for best performance was greater among the better skilled and the older subjects. Stability of goodness ranking between the two ratings by the college students was higher among the experienced than the non-learners. | |||||
書誌情報 |
教育心理学研究 en : 教育心理学研究 巻 44, 号 2, p. 136-144, 発行日 1996-06 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 日本教育心理学会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 00215015 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00345837 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher |